Comments about #6852

Add a comment


     

Comments

Sara: Very good range of areas, I thought. Didn't see spelling errors (hardly major) and the 'sound' of numbers works fine. (4 months, 3 weeks ago)

Brett: "Fore"? Really? Rubbish. (2 years, 1 month ago)

RowG: Didn't accept Roald Dahl characters as answer (4 years, 1 month ago)

bzgbzgbzd: Sorry everyone im only 10 years old. I tried my best. And everyone says its rubbish. That's definitely helpful. (sarcastic) (4 years, 2 months ago)

KJ: "Fore"? Really? Rubbish. (4 years, 2 months ago)

The Lad: Ruined by the mistakes. (4 years, 2 months ago)

at: fore is not a number. FOUR is a number (4 years, 2 months ago)

darto: some really nice ideas= not quite carried through (4 years, 2 months ago)

Mister Tom: Some nice ideas but the typos rather spoil it. (4 years, 2 months ago)

T: A few annoying typos: it should have been 'teletubby' and 'phosphorus'. However I loved the diversity of the connections, the blue one in particular was very clever. Nice Grid (4 years, 2 months ago)

Blearagirl: What number is fore? Impossible to solve. (4 years, 2 months ago)

Mr_NO_NAME: LOVVEEEEEEEEEEEEE IT (4 years, 2 months ago)