Comments about #37

Add a comment



Redkite: I'm with IR! (4 months, 3 weeks ago)

weegieman: Excellent, very inventive. Far too difficult for me, but enjoyable once I knew the answers. (1 year, 3 months ago)

North Star: look at Jenny! expensive glasses! (1 year, 4 months ago)

OnlyConnect: Damn this was hard. If I hadn't looked up this stuff, I'd certainly get 1/10 since all I knew were the dances (did have at least some inkling of the pandas too) (1 year, 11 months ago)

DaveDave: Got the dances, but didn't manage to get all the clues. Managed the connections when the wall resolved though...I really liked and hated this one :) (3 years ago)

tucholsky: Jenny you should have mixed some of these clues with other puzzles. The whole point is to drag someone into not recognising a connection through red herrings or words that could fit two different clues, It is not to alienate people from the start (4 years, 7 months ago)

IR: Difficult because it relies on utterly obscure information. It is not clever to simply build a grid from obscure data that no-one is likely to know. The clever part of a 'fiendish' grid should be constructing it from elements people are familiar with, but they can't spot the links. This is just a rummage through obscure facts. (7 years, 5 months ago)

Wing Commander, Bear and Moulton fingers: OUCH Very hard (7 years, 5 months ago)

Quizzle: Another excellent very cleverly put together grid. ()